“Medical” Board of Corporate Bias Targets Doctors Who Question Them | Dr. Peter McCullough

June 28, 2022

interview featured image Jeff Matheson
83% of First-Trimester Women Miscarry After Getting the Jab
interview with rob anders featured image
How We Broke Politics in Canada: And How We Fix It
interview featured image mark trozzi
‘Vaccine’ Dependency: How the Covid ‘Vaccines’ Create New Variants
inteview featured images stephen malthouse
It is Illegal to Advertise Vaccines in Canada: How Dr. Malthouse is Going After Offenders
inteview featured images prof allen
The Deadly Cost of Lockdowns: Interview with Prof. Douglas Allen, Dept. of Economics, SFU
Featured image be the virus speech
Be the Virus: How We Defeat Tyranny
august update featured image
Will’s August Update
Featured image interview sylvain henry
National Referendum to End All Lockdown Measures in Canada

Dr. Peter McCullough is board certified in internal medicine, cardiovascular diseases, and clinical lipidology.  He cares for patients with heart and kidney disease and has become an expert on treating COVID-19 illnesses. Dr. McCullough joins us to discuss recent developments in threatening his livelihood in the possible revocation of his hospital privileges as a result of his position during this PLAN-demic.  

On the threats to doctor’s livelihoods…

To clarify, the American Board of Internal Medicine credentials doctors to be Board certified in internal medicine and the specialty. So, I’ve maintained internal medicine and cardiovascular diseases board specialty certification. Now that’s different than a medical license. The medical license is granted by the states. And so, I hold a medical license in Texas. My medical license is not threatened, but my Board certifications are, and without Board certification, I can’t have hospital privileges. I can’t participate in insurance plans. Both the medical license and the Board certifications are essential to medical practice in the United States. So, my livelihood is being threatened by a contention. The Board in the letter makes the implicit assumption that the current sets of genetic biologic inoculations that are mandated in so many different walks of life, that they have an implicit presumption that they’re safe and effective.

On how the President of the Board is now Threatening via Twitter….

It started out with the presumption that there’s safety and efficacy. And then [the letter] said specifically that you made statements that drew into question the efficacy and safety of the products that could lead someone to not take one of them. So, it’s clear that their orientation is try to inject bias to actually have patients take an investigational biologic gene transfer product and like any product, there are benefits, there are risks.

LINKS:

Website: Courage to Face Covid by Dr. Peter McCullough and John Leake

Book: Courage to Face Covid

 

Fund the Fight for Our Rights

Canada is under attack, both from within and without. Help us provide Canadians with tools to recover and defend their rights.

Recurring monthly donations only. Updated manually.